Legal Opinion

Partrick v. Preiser

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge L. Cobb, J.

In this action in partition, defendants Preiser, Michaels and Walowitt move to confirm the report of the Referee appointed to hear and report.

The said report concludes that the said defendants are entitled to a judgment against the plaintiffs in the sum of $394.58 and that a judgment should be entered herein appointing three commissioners to make an actual partition of1 the real property which is the subject of this action. The plaintiffs do not oppose that portion of the Referee’s report dealing with a money judgment, but vigorously oppose the proposal that the real property be actually…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Clason v. ClasonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  4. Grody v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. Harlem Savings Bank v. LarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashley v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schwartz v. MeisnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Snyder Fulton Street, LLC v. Fulton Interest, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Ashley v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API