Hardaway v. CIT Group/Consumer Finance Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint against CIT Group/Consumer Finance Inc. (“CIT”),1 the entity he claims serviced a loan secured by his home, and Kimberly Weissman, an attorney who represented that entity in connection with the foreclosure of plaintiffs home. Plaintiff asserts numerous violations of constitutional, statutory, and state law arising out of the foreclosure action. Defendant CIT has moved to dismiss all claims against it pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(6). The motion is granted because, as discussed below, even under…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Armbrister v. Pushpin Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Blankenship v. Pushpin Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Grabianski v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Bader v. Navient Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Bingham v. Centier BankDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.