Legal Opinion
Cardinal v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 26, 1993No. 92-CV-73359-DTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Fred and Gloria Cardinal instituted this action to quiet title and remove cloud on title to real estate in Oakland County Circuit Court on May 18, 1992. Defendant timely removed the action to this Court on June 16, 1992 on the grounds that the United States of America is the Defendant.
II.PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In their original complaint, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant has no interest in the property located at 156 New York in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fred A. Cardinal and Gloria M. Cardinal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- In re ReadyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2001