Legal Opinion

Fred A. Cardinal and Gloria M. Cardinal v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 15, 1994No. 93-1588PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, Circuit Judge.

What is the proper measure of a taxpayer’s interest in real property purchased under a land contract for purposes of assessing the value of a federal tax lien? The district court held that the taxpayers’ interest in the real property was limited to the amount the taxpayer had paid under the contract, 817 F.Supp. 647. We disagree and reverse.

Federal law governs the priority of a tax lien relative to other claims to property. Aquilino v. United States, 363 U.S. 509, 513-14, 80 S.Ct. 1277, 1280-81, 4 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1960). However, state law generally determines what…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. BrosnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Barker v. KlinglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. United States v. Big Value Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Francis J. Vereyken and Patricia M. Vereyken v. Annie's Place, Inc., State of Michigan, United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tawanda Hall v. Andrew MeisnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  2. In re GuerreroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  3. Sumpter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  4. Louis Jackson v. Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization InitiativeMichigan Supreme Court · 2025
  5. United States v. Patrice HaroldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API