Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Work

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1936No. 10204Published

1Opinion

On Appellant’s Second Motion for Rehearing.

PLEASANTS, Chief Justice.

We have carefully considered this motion and all of the written arguments filed in its support, and adhere to the conclusion reached by us in passing upon and refusing appellant’s first motion for rehearing. The docket entry dismissing the first motion was inadvertently made by the writer. The motion was fully considered, and corrections in the statement of facts made in our first opinion pointed out in the motion were made, and the motion refused.

The second motion for rehearing presents questions not raised in the first mo…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Isbell v. LennoxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Cathey v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Waterman Lumber Co. v. BeattyTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Jones v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API