Legal Opinion

Ericson v. Jorgensen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1950No. 13970_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken from the judgment rendered by the District Court pursuant to and in accordance with its opinion which is reported at 81 F.Supp. 614 and is here referred to in entirety to avoid repetition. As stated in the opinion, the action was brought by bill in equity under Revised Statutes Sec. 4915, Title 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain a decree authorizing the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent including a claim which was the subject matter of an interference proceeding before the Patent Office, to the General Motors Corporation, assignee of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Larson v. CrowtherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Jorgensen v. EricsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1949
  5. Jorgensen v. Otto Henning & Carter Carburetor Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Norman W. Kirschke and General Electric Company v. William C. LamarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  2. Sanford v. KepnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1954
  4. Jorgensen v. ShaffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Otto Henning and Carter Carburetor Corporation v. Clarence H. Jorgensen, Clarence H. Jorgensen, Administrator, and General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API