Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 17, 2007No. 19-1486PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

This case presents our first occasion to address the bulk cash smuggling provisions of the 2001 USA PATRIOT Act, Pub.L. No. 107-56, § 371, 115 Stat. 272, 336-38 (codified as amended at 31 U.S.C. § 5332). Defendant Otilio Jose challenges the district court’s forfeiture order in the amount of $114,948, arguing that it constitutes an excessive fine in violation of the Eighth Amendment. He does not challenge his straight guilty plea to counts arising from his failure to declare the amount of currency he was attempting to take with him out of the country. We hold that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. PonzoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Del Toro-BarbozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. LevesqueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Pérez-MeléndezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. FoggCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API