Legal Opinion

Perdue Farms, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1997No. 96-2128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge HAMILTON and Judge WILLIAMS joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Appellee Perdue Farms, Inc. brought suit in federal district court contending that the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had violated section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 159(c). Specifically, the company claimed that the NLRB had not adequately investigated allegations that the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) forged signatures on authorization cards submitted in support of a unionization effort at a Perdue plant. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1996
  4. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perdue Farms, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API