Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Wabash Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1910No. Docket No. 80PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Edward Hayes against the Wabasb Railroad Company for breach of a contract of carriage. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Upon writ of error this case is brought to this court for review by defendant, asking that a judgment recovered against it be reversed, for reasons hereafter stated. The suit was brought by plaintiff to recover certain damages claimed to have been sustained by him on account of the failure of defendant to perform a certain special contract of carriage, made and entered into between plaintiff and the agent of defendant company in. Detroit having entire charge of its ticket office in the city, being styled the “city passenger and ticket agent,” and who has been so employed for many years.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Winter's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Foster v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  3. Rudell v. Ogdensburg Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Van Camp v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hallock v. Income Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Harmon v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. McConnell v. United States Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Sturges v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SpurlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API