Harmon v. Barber
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; Howard C. Hollister, Judge. Action by Lucinda Barber, administratrix of the estate of James C. Barber, deceased against Judson Harmon and another, receivers of the Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, as receivers (hereinafter called defendants), through their agent, sold and issued to decedent, Barber, a ticket entitling him to transportation from Toledo, Ohio, to Columbus in that state, by way of Piqua. The ticket contained two coupons—the one for carriage from Toledo to Piqua, over the line of the Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company; the other from Piqua to Columbus, by way of the Pennsylvania lines. At Piqua the receivers’ agent issued and delivered to decedent a ticket for transfer from the Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton depot…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Railroad Co. v. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Wood v. KahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Boyles v. McClureTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Pariso v. TowseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Wilson v. MoudyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Shelton Taxi Company v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.