Legal Opinion

Cothran v. Coe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 25, 1941No. Civil Action No, 5143PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge (Specially Assigned).

In this case the plaintiffs are seeking a judgment entitling them to receive from the Commissioner of Patents, a patent including 28 claims of which the Commissioner was willing to allow only 2. The jurisdiction of the court and procedure is based on 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, R.S. 49.15. The case is a proceeding de novo; Butterworth v. United States ex rel. Hoe, 112 U.S. 50, 61, 5 S.Ct. 25, 28 L.Ed. 656; Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Mfg. Co., 177 U.S. 485, 20 S.Ct. 708, 44 L.Ed. 856; Nichols v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 109 F. 2d 162; although the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. Sharp v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Rendleman v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API