Legal Opinion

Yates v. City of Raleigh

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1980No. 7910SC930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

At the outset we point out that the record on appeal is remarkable in what it fails to contain. The ordinance pleaded by the plaintiff as being unconstitutional, cited by the defendants as their authority for taking plaintiff’s property, and finally declared constitutional by the trial judge, is not in the record, and as far as the record discloses, was not introduced into evidence. The provisions of the City Charter to which the judge referred in his order and apparently upon which he relied to some extent to support the order of dismissal are not in the record, and as far as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Horton v. GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Rhyne v. Town of Mount HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Carolina Builders Corp. v. AAA Dry Wall, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Kelly v. BrilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pearce v. American Defender Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Plemmons Ex Rel. Teeter v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Boyce v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Sethness v. SethnessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Pearce v. American Defender Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API