Legal Opinion

Pearce v. American Defender Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1983No. 8210SC851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

In their briefs, the parties state the following versions of the question presented on appeal:

Plaintiff: [W]hether, assuming the accuracy of plaintiffs allegations, defendant has acted wrongfully.

Defendant: [W]hether such action [referring to the May, 1971 exchange of letters] can be construed as placing within the coverage of a life insurance policy risks not originally insured against.

There in no dispute about the facts of this case. The sole issue in the case is whether the insured’s death is covered under certain terms of a life insurance policy, issued by defendant, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grant v. Emmco InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. United Leasing Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Shoffner Industries, Inc. v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Duke v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pearce v. American Defender Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Pierson v. BuyherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Pearce v. American Defender Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Pierson v. BuyherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API