Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Huff
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WASHBURN, PJ.
The evidence which it is claimed was incompetent, is to the effect that the assist •ant district manager of the company who had authority to and did supervise Mr. Huff’s accounts and checked up on his collections, and who did assist and direct him in the discharge of his duties, was present at various times when Mrs. Huff was with her husband in said automobile while he was in the discharge of his duties, that said assistant manager encouraged Mrs. Huff to ride with her husband on his trips in the transaction of the business of the company, and that he advised Mr. Huff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Chase v. New Haven Waste Material CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Emerson v. Western Seed & Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Riser v. RiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- McLaurin v. McLaurin Furniture Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Koontz v. Messer & Quaker State Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Mullally v. Langenberg Bros. Grain Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Mi-Lady Cleaners v. McDanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Myers v. Tranquility Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.