Legal Opinion

Mi-Lady Cleaners v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1938No. 3 Div. 245PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action on the case by an infant, three years old, suing by next friend, against appellant, Mi-Lady Cleaners, a partnership composed of Emily Stock and Mary Peacock, and the Nehi Bottling Company, a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries inflicted on the plaintiff in an automobile collision between a Chevrolet automobile, alleged to be the property of Mi-Lady Cleaners, in which plaintiff “was lawfully riding,” and a truck of the Nehi Bottling Company, on the intersection of Jefferson Davis and Cleveland avenues in the city of Montgomery.

The complaint…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Maine v. James Maine & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Duke v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nocktonick Ex Rel. Matson v. NocktonickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Breed v. Atlanta, B. C. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. May v. Palm Beach Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Westbrook v. GibbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API