Legal Opinion

Gildow v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 29, 1998No. C941050CV; CA A96237PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action for injunctive relief, seeking to require defendants, who hold an easement for use of a gravel road over plaintiffs property, to maintain the road and to refrain from traveling outside of the established easement. He appeals from a judgment for defendants after the trial court’s order of involuntary dismissal. We conclude that the trial court erred in dismissing the claim and reverse and remand.

Defendants own a four-acre parcel that has no access from a public road. The gravel road that is the subject of this dispute runs from a county road along the southwest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Jewett v. Deerhorn Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wilson v. ParentOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Ranger Insurance v. Globe Seed & Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Watson v. BanducciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Vance v. FordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Simpkins v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. In re the Marriage of ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API