Legal Opinion
Spickler v. Greenberg
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 11, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Justice.
Leo Greenberg and the Harbor Shop (Greenberg) appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Lipez, /.), following a jury trial in which Greenberg was found liable for perjury pursuant to Maine’s unique civil perjury statute, 14 M.R.S.A. § 870 (1980). 1 Because Spickler failed to establish the elements necessary for recovery pursuant to the statute, we vacate the judgment.
This case is the culmination of almost fourteen years of litigation between the parties. The pertinent facts may be taken from Spickler v. Greenberg, 586 A.2d 1232, 1233 (Me.1991),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Spickler v. GreenbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Spickler v. FlynnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Milner v. HareSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
- McCracken v. McCrackenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cooper v. Parker-HugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Lundborg v. Phoenix Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Pratt v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Better Way Ford, LLC v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.