Legal Opinion

Milner v. Hare

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 27, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.

Action brought under R. S. Chap. 87, Sec. 159 by a defeated litigant, in a case heard by a referee, against his successful adversary, to recover damages caused by the alleged perjury of the latter. A demurrer to the declaration was sustained by the Presiding Justice. The Plaintiff excepts.

*15The statute in question reads thus: — “When a judgment has been obtained against a party by the perjury of a witness introduced at the trial by the adverse party, the injured party may bring an action on the case within three years after such judgment or after final judgment in any proceedings for a review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Peru & Dixfield v. BarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  2. Karahalies v. DukaisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lundborg v. Phoenix Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Bean v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Copeland v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Spickler v. GreenbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Kraul v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API