Legal Opinion
Spickler v. Greenberg
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 19, 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRODY, Justice.
Robert D. Spickler and Olive S. Spickler appeal from two summary judgments entered against them in the Superior Court (Cumberland County) on their complaint seeking damages for perjury. 1 The Spick-lers contend that summary judgment was precluded by the existence of genuine issues of material fact. We agree and vacate the summary judgment as to Defendant Leo Greenberg, but we disagree and affirm as to Defendants Myer M. Marcus and Peter S. Plumb.
In 1979, Maine Coast Properties, Inc., a business brokerage firm, entered into a listing agreement with the Harbor Shop, Inc., for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lidstone v. GreenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Nichols v. MarsdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- State v. LunneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Richards Realty Co. v. Inhabitants of Town of Castle HillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lester v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Binette v. Dyer Library Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Levine v. R.B.K. Caly Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Bahre v. Liberty Group, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Spickler v. GreenbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.