Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Weekley Elevator Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 14, 1927No. 17769PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, P. .J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The principle announced in the first division of the syllabus requires no elaboration. See Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872 (43 S. E. 280); Rountree v. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. Co., 31 Ga. App. 231, 236 (120 S. E. 654).
Save for the fact that the record indicates that the Beliance Company did in fact pay back to the Weekley Company the cost *133ancl charges spent by it in the repair work in question, there would seem to be a total lack of proof going to indicate that the Weekley Company was in any wise authorized to act for and on behalf of the Eeliance…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Huey v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Rountree v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BoothSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. MiddlebrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Graham v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Marchant v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Pace v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Mathis v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Higgins v. D. & F. ELECTRIC CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.