Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Monumental Life Insurance

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1940No. 3100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on application for rehearing.

Two questions are urged: (1) That the court did not consider or pass upon the claimed error in the failure of the trial judge to charge the jury that if and when it appeared that the insured had been treated by a physician within two years prior to the issuance of the policy, the burden of proving that such treatment was not for a serious disease was upon the plaintiff.(2) As the plaintiff in her own behalf offered in evidence the application for insurance, this removed any objection to the admissibility of the waiver which was a part…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Scott's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Carrugi v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  5. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bracale v. Monumental Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. DiNuzzo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API