Goss v. Trinity Savings & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
The principal issue presented is whether a note with an adjustable interest rate tied to the average yield on U.S. Treasury Securities (T-bills) is a negotiable instrument as defined by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 12A O.S.1981, § 3-104(l)(b). Initially, however, we must consider; 1) whether the court allowed Appellees a double recovery; 2) whether the court correctly ruled the unauthorized alteration made on the face of the note was material thereby justifying the cancellation of the note under 15 O.S. § 239 in Appellees’ favor; and 3) whether the court’s award of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Klehm v. Grecian Chalet, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. IngelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Taylor v. RoederSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Amberboy v. Societe De Banque PriveeTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Yin v. Society National Bank IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- STATE ex rel. PRUITT v. NATIVE WHOLESALE SUPPLYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Carnegie Bank v. ShalleckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.