Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Maritime Overseas Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1993No. 1911884 to 1911890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are 1) former seamen who claim to have suffered severe and debilitating illness because of exposure to asbestos while working on board various ships that were owned and operated by the defendants; 2) the personal representatives of deceased seamen who the representatives say died as a result of exposure to asbestos; and 3) the seamen's wives, who sue derivatively for damages for loss of consortium. The plaintiffs base their right to recover damages on, among other things, the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. App. § 688 et seq., and general maritime law. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Matthews v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  4. Sessions v. Jack Cole CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Williams v. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Amerada Hess v. Owens-Corning FiberglassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Ex Parte GoldsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Bradberry v. Carrier Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. CHIEPALICH v. CoaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Crews v. McLINGSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API