Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Township of Lake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 72PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case-made from Missaukee; Lamb, J. Assumpsit by James McConnell against the township of Lake, in the county of Missaukee, to recover a tax paid under protest. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff, a veteran of the Civil War, resided in the village of Jennings, Lake township, Missaukee county, Mich., where he owned three village lots, which, as part of the property within the platted limits of said village, appeared against his name on the assessment roll of the township of Lake for the year 1914, as follows:

“Lot one 1, block I — Soldier’s Exemption. Lot eleven 11, block I, assessed $250. E. % lot 12, block I— Soldier’s Exemption. W 1/2 lot 12, block I, assessed $200.”

After demand of payment by the tax collector and threat of levy, plaintiff paid the taxes assessed against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Joseph's Church v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In re WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cooper Hospital v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Remus v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Auditor General v. Union Benevolent Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. In Re Atherton's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Frigid Food Products, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Heller v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API