Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heller v. Department of Revenue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. Docket No. 46, Calendar No. 45,338Published

1DissentBoyles, J.

I am not in accord with Chief Justice North’s conclusion that Heller, a widower who has survived his former wife Hazel, a de*201ceased daughter of the testatrix, is entitled to the exemption and preferential rate allowed by our inheritance tax statute to the husband of a daughter of the testatrix.

The Chief Justice relies on decisions in New York, Illinois and New Jersey. It may be conceded that the surrogate’s court in New York,1 and the supreme courts of Illinois2 and New Jersey3 have held that “husband of a daughter” in their inheritance tax statutes also meant “widower” of a daughter. But it…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. St. Joseph's Church v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In re the Estate of RayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895
  5. Remus v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API