Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ippolito v. Nancy Ann Dressed Dolls

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 29, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5694Published

1DissentO’Connell, Judge

’ Numerous fallacies in the court’s decision in this case are explicitly disclosed in authoritative detail- (1) by the following opinion prepared and submitted months ago with the view that it would be adopted as the majority opinion, and (2) by the citations following that opinion which point to the entirely contradictory attitude of the court’ not only in the case at bar but also in other cases upon which the court has relied.

•J It should be noted at the outset that the majority opinion states that “On appeal the commissioner sustained all of the reasoning advanced by the Examiner of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Durable Toy & Novelty Corporation v. J. Chein & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. Application of Laskin Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  5. Alumatone Corp. v. Vita-Var Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API