Legal Opinion
United States v. Bagnall, Allan J., in No. 89-5801, and Bagnall, Beverly Jayne, in No. 89-5802
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 1990No. 432PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Allan J. Bagnall and his wife, Beverly J. Bagnall, were each convicted of two counts of introducing and attempting to introduce imported merchandise into the commerce of the United States by means of false statements, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 542. Allan Bagnall was additionally convicted of one count of conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The Bagnalls appeal from the judgments of sentence, challenging their convictions on sufficiency of the evidence grounds. We conclude that the Bagnalls’ automobile purchase scheme did not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Lawrence RoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Richard Terry Ruuska Appeal of Richard T. RuuskaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Twenty-Five Packages of Panama HatsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. HolmquistCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. an Antique Platter of GoldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. An Antique Platter Of GoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Modes, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1992
- United States v. An Antique Platter of GoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.