Legal Opinion

United States v. An Antique Platter of Gold

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 12, 1999No. 97-6319PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Chief Judge:

Michael H. Steinhardt appeals from Judge Jones’s ordering of the forfeiture of a “Phiale,” an antique gold platter. The district court held that false statements on the customs entry forms and the Phiale’s status as stolen property under Italian law *133rendered its importation illegal. As such, the Phiale was subject to forfeiture.

Steinhardt contends that: (i) the false statements on the customs forms were not material under 18 U.S.C. § 542, (ii) stolen property under the National Stolen Property Act (“NSPA”) does not encompass property presumed to belong to the state under…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Frederick SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Bogar Allax Monter v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. United States v. An Antique Platter Of GoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Pentax Corp.United States Court of International Trade · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API