Legal Opinion

People v. Imported Quality Guard Dogs, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*801In this summary proceeding, the petitioner submitted evidence establishing, prima facie, that Perry Reich (hereinafter the appellant) was an officer of a corporation that he knew had engaged “in repeated fraudulent or illegal acts or otherwise demonstrate^] persistent fraud or illegality in the carrying on, conducting or transaction of business” (Executive Law § 63 [12]; see General Business Law §§ 349, 350; People v Apple Health & Sports Clubs, 80 NY2d 803, 807 [1992]; Matter of People v Applied Card Sys., Inc., 27 AD3d 104, 106-107 [2005]; People v General Elec. Co., 302 AD2d 314, 314-315…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. Apple Health & Sports Clubs, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Scalone v. Phelps Memorial Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. Applied Card Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. People v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. VeleanuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Wicks v. Leemilt's Petroleum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Wicks v. Leemilt's Petroleum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API