Legal Opinion

Mays v. Hankinson & Hagler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1923No. 14756PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Distraint; from city court of Richmond county—Judge Black. June 8, 19.23.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

A rent note called for “40,000 lbs. of United States standard lint cotton.” On the trial of a distress warrant to collect an alleged balance due to the landlord, claimed to be owing partly by reason of a very small balance of cotton not delivered, but mainly by reason of the fact that most of the cotton actually delivered was of a grade below the basis of “middling,” and consequently of less value than the cotton 'to which he was entitled, proof was submitted, without objection, in explanation of the term “United States standard lint cotton,” as follows: “There are several grades in United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vardeman v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Lowery Lock Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Stewart & Son v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Stamey v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Daniel v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aronoff v. United States Fire Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. City of LaGrange v. WhitleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. General Forms, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API