Legal Opinion

Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Blount

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1925No. 15871PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

Notwithstanding the acknowledgment in the policy of the receipt of the first premium, under the stipulation in the application, that the contract of insurance should not be in force unless or until a policy should be issued and delivered to the assured and the first premium thereon actually paid during his lifetime and good health, the payment of the premium according to the terms-of the agreement was a condition precedent to the liability of the insurer, unless there was a due or unconditional delivery of the policy by the company. Reliance Life Ins. Co.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Mechanics & Traders Insurance v. Mutual Real Estate & Blg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Reliance Life Insurance v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. American National Insurance v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Thurmond v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of WorldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API