Legal Opinion

Williams v. County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1910No. 6401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Routt County C°urt — Hon. Charles A. Morning, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Appellee, as petitioner, instituted proceedings under the Eminent Domain Act against the appellant, as respondent, to condemn certain lands of the latter for the purposes of a highway, which terminated in a judgment in favor of the petitioner, from which the respondent has appealed. '

Respondent appeared specially and filed a plea to abate the proceedings, which was overruled. This ruling, it is contended, was erroneous. The averments of the plea, were to the effect that, at the time the condemnation- proceedings were instituted, another action was pending in the district court, in which a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradner Smith & Co. v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Colorado Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Four Mile Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  4. Thompson v. DeWeese-Dye Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. German National Bank v. J. D. Best & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wrightsman v. Southwestern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Graybill v. CorlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  3. Arakawa v. Co-Operative Farmers' ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Jennings v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API