Legal Opinion

Vincent Di Carlo and Mrs. Rose M. Savarino, His Wife v. Latter & Blum, Inc., Bernard Kansas, and Francisco Pacanins, Latter & Blum, Inc. And Bernard Kansas v. Vincent Di Carlo and Mrs. Rose M. Savarino, His Wife

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 20, 1959No. 17568Published

1Opinion of the Court

266 F.2d 656

Vincent DI CARLO and Mrs. Rose M. SAVARINO, his wife, Appellants,

v.

LATTER & BLUM, INC., Bernard Kansas, and Francisco Pacanins, Appellees.

LATTER & BLUM, INC. and Bernard Kansas, Appellants,

v.

Vincent DI CARLO and Mrs. Rose M. SAVARINO, his wife, Appellees.

No. 17568.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

May 13, 1959.

Rehearing Denied July 20, 1959.

Albert B. Koorie, Benjamin E. Loup, New Orleans, La., for appellant Di Carlo et al.

Charles F. Seemann, Robert U. Blum, New Orleans, La., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Froment v. DuclosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887
  2. Di Carlo v. PacaninsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1958
  3. Di Carlo v. Latter & Blum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API