Di Carlo v. Latter & Blum, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs, resident citizens of New Orleans, Louisiana, asserting federal jurisdiction under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1351,1 and alleging that they had been induced by fraud to purchase a certain property in the City of New Orleans, brought this suit as a redhibitory action against the defendant-appellee Pacanins, the duly recognized Consul of the Republic of Venezuela at New Orleans, as vendor, joining in it his agents in the sale, Latter & Blum, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, and its employee, Bernard Kansas, a resident and citizen of Louisiana.
The defendant Pacanins answered denying…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Froment v. DuclosDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887
- Di Carlo v. PacaninsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1958