Legal Opinion

Dahar v. Grzandziel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1991No. 542PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this case we are called upon to determine whether the trial court properly held the appellant-attorney, Middleman, personally liable for his client’s dental costs based on its finding that an enforceable contract to protect the appelleedentist’s, Dr. Dahar’s, fees out of the client’s settlement funds existed between appellant-attorney and appellee-dentist. We find that the appellee-dentist furnished sufficient consideration, by providing information that was instrumental in creating the settlement fund from which appellant-attorney collected his fee, to support…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. McGuire v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Cardamone v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Necho Coal Co. v. Denise Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. 718 Arch Street Associates, Ltd. v. Blatstein (In Re Blatstein)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Eighth North-Val, Inc. v. William L. Parkinson, D.D.S., P.C., Pension TrustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Fort Washington Resources, Inc. v. TannenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Adelvision, L.P. v. GroffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Aircraft Guaranty Corp. v. Strato-Lift, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API