Legal Opinion
Jerry Denzil Davidson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1966No. 8758PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of entering, on or about December 13, 1960, the Bank of Red Oak, Red Oak, Oklahoma, with the intent to commit a larceny therein, violative of 18 U.S.C. 2113(a). This is a direct appeal from that conviction.
The only ground upon which the conviction is attacked is that appellant’s confession of the crime charged should have been suppressed by the trial court for the reason that the defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel at the time the confession was taken, in violation of Amendment VI to the United States…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. FerrariNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BillingsNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- Gilmore v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Biglow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.