Legal Opinion

State v. MacIntyre

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1969No. State 117PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In disciplinary proceedings brought against members of the legal profession, as in other types of actions, the similarly situated are to be treated similarly. However, each such proceeding appears to bring special factors and individual characteristics, distinguishing it, in degree if not in kind, from earlier proceedings of a generally similar nature. This is certainly true in this proceeding.

Here we deal with an attorney who was convicted, on his plea of nolo contendere in the federal court of wil-fully and knowingly attempting to evade and defeat the payment of a part of his federal income…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cohen v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. State v. KernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. MacIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. CainWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Reidinger v. Optometry Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. PostorinoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. SusmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ChatelainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against HabermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API