Legal Opinion

State v. Chandler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 27, 2010No. 298PA09PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Justice.

In this appeal we determine there has been no “significant change” in the law regarding admissibility of expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases since the time of defendant’s trial and appeal. Thus, we hold that defendant is not entitled to the relief he sought pursuant to the retroactivity rule set forth in N.C.G.S. § 15A-1415(b)(7). We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Background

Defendant was convicted in 1987 of five counts of first-degree sexual offense, six counts of taking indecent liberties with a child, and one count of crime against…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. AgualloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Maconeghy Jr., K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Maconeghy Jr., K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  5. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API