Legal Opinion

State v. Harwood

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2013No. COA12-1301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Defendant Edward Jay Harwood challenges an order denying a motion for appropriate relief in which he sought to have eighteen of the nineteen convictions for possession of a firearm by a felon resulting *479from a plea of guilty which he entered on 24 July 2007 vacated. In his brief, Defendant argues that this Court should reverse the trial court’s order and afford him relief from eighteen of his nineteen convictions on the basis that those convictions are inconsistent with our decision in State v. Garris, 191 N.C. App. 276, 663 S.E.2d 340, disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 684, 670…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API