Legal Opinion

Procell v. Peerless Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1962No. 9643PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDY, Judge.

This is an action by plaintiffs, husband and wife, for the recovery of damages resulting from personal injuries to the latter arising from an automobile collision which occurred in the City of Mansfield, and plaintiffs appeal from judgment rejecting their demands.

Three vehicles were involved in the accident, namely, a Chevrolet Sedan owned by plaintiffs in community and operated at the time by plaintiff wife; a Ford Pickup truck owned by Sherman Page, insured by Peerless Insurance Company, both of which parties are the named defendants in this action, operated at the time by one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howze v. HollandsworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Coleman v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Phillips v. StevensonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Santiago v. BrondumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. St. Pierre v. DufresneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sears v. Mid-City Motors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bakewell v. FernandezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Rigaud v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Sears v. Mid-City Motors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API