Rigaud v. Orkin Exterminating Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiff appealed the dismissal of his suit seeking damages from defendants Or-kin Exterminating Company, Inc., and its bonding company Massachusetts Bonding *917& Insurance Company. Plaintiff’s home became infested with termites and as a result suffered damages while the home was under contract with Orkin.
The trial court held that plaintiff failed to prove negligence and certainly not gross negligence, on the part of Orkin. We find to the contrary.
Plaintiff’s testimony indicates a belief that Orkin, in effect, insured against a reinfestation of termites and resulting damage. But…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Germann v. 557 Tire Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Green v. Farmers' Consolidated Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Schmidt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Pothier v. Barber Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Procell v. Peerless InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meador v. Toyota of Jefferson, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Ostrowe v. DarensbourgLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979