Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Brondum

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1954No. 20410PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McBRIDE, Judge.

Plaintiff’s suit was dismissed on a plea of contributory negligence and he has -taken this appeal. He claims of defendants the sum of $562.82 for damages sustained by his automobile in an accident which occurred at the intersection of Tupelo and Chartres Streets in New Orleans. The defendants are father and son and respectively the owner and driver of the automobile which collided with plaintiff’s car.

*566There is no question that the younger Brondum was guilty of negligence, as he frankly admitted that at the time of the accident he was driving at 30 miles per hour, considerably…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howze v. HollandsworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Coleman v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Phillips v. StevensonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. St. Pierre v. DufresneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gallioto v. ChisholmLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. McAndrews v. RoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Procell v. Peerless InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Rigaud v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API