Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. Prettner

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1955No. Civ. 16397PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the case as to defendants Wm. T. Mareollo and Louis Cannelora, entered on an order striking the amended complaint from the files.

Question Presented

Did the court abuse its discretion in striking from the files an amended complaint which made no appreciable effort to meet the objections which the court had sustained to the original complaint ?

Record

Plaintiff filed a complaint. Defendants Marcollo and Cannelora demurred. * Their demurrer was sustained with leave to amend. Thereafter plaintiff filed an amended complaint. Said defendants moved for an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Wilson v. SheaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hills Transportation Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Witczak v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Moore v. Twentynine Palms County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API