Legal Opinion

V & M STAR, LP v. Centimark Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 24, 2010No. 09-3249PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

The present case involves a lawsuit brought by V & M Star, LP against Centimark Corporation. Summary judgment was granted in favor of Centimark by the district court, and Y & M now appeals. For the reasons set forth below, we REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

V & M alleges that jurisdiction exists in this case pursuant to the diversity-jurisdiction provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Under this provision, there must be complete diversity such that no plaintiff is a citizen of the same state as any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Delay v. Rosenthal Collins Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Sloss Industries Corporation v. EurisolCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Autozone, Inc. v. Glidden Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  2. Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor LLC v. Amex Nooter, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016
  3. Evanston Insurance Co. v. Housing Authority of SomersetCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. AIX Specialty Insurance Company v. Kims New Star LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
  5. Abraham v. American Resource Company LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API