Legal Opinion
In Re Klein
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1999No. 98-BG-27PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
This reciprocal discipline ease comes to us from the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”). In 1992, the Supreme Court of California suspended respondent for eighteen months after respondent stipulated that he violated Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code §§ 6068(b) & (d), and former Cal. Rules of PROFESSIONAL Conduct Rule 7-105(1) by making misrepresentations to the probate court. The California Court stayed the suspension and placed respondent on probation for eighteen months, subject to conditions recommended by the Hearing Department of the California State Bar. In 1995, the California…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re SaboorianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MidlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006