Legal Opinion

Palmer & Sicard, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 6, 1984No. 394-83CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WHITE, Senior Judge.

The plaintiff, Palmer & Sicard, Inc., sues to recover from the Government the sum of $127,982.09 allegedly due under government contract DACA 51-79-C-0054 (“the contract”).

The complaint was filed on June 16,1983, under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (Supp. V 1981)).

On September 6, 1983, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court does not have jurisdiction to consider the claim because (according to the defendant) the plaintiff has not properly certified its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. Skelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. W. H. Moseley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. T.J.D. Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. United States v. Turner Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. National Surety Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Gardner Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API