Legal Opinion

Outdoor Systems Advertising, Inc v. Korth

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2000No. Docket 210281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying, in part, its motion for summary disposition and granting, in part, summary disposition in favor of defendant. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff is in the outdoor advertising business. It is the successor in interest to billboards located on the roof and east wall of defendant’s building. Plaintiff and its predecessors in interest have continuously maintained the billboards and related components since the time the original lease agreements were executed in 1922 and 1946. Defendant’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Johnson v. Harnischfeger Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Michigan National Bank v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams Outdoor Advertising v. City of East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Adams Outdoor Advertising v. City of East LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lamar Advertising Southwest, Inc. v. Grandview Realty, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
  4. Leonid Rozenberg v. Auto Club Group Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API