Legal Opinion
Ed. Winkler & Son, Inc. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 5, 1982No. 896, September Term, 1981PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.
We are concerned here with a question of insurance coverage. Is appellee, Ohio Casualty Insurance Co., obliged under its Special Multi-Peril Policy to defend appellant, its insured, 1 in an action brought against appellant by Nina and Benjamin Cromwell? The Circuit Court for Baltimore County answered in the negative and we shall do likewise.
The Cromwells sued appellant for slander, malicious prosecution, and false arrest. They alleged in their Declaration that, while a customer in appellant’s jewelry store on October 30,1980, Mrs. Cromwell was wrongfully accused by appellant of stealing a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- American Home Assurance Co. v. OsbournCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Harleysville Mutual Casualty Company v. Harris & Brooks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Levy v. DuclauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. MoultonMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Red Ball Leasing, Inc. And American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Architex Ass'n, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- Jim Barna Log Systems Midwest, Inc. v. General Casualty Insurance Co. of WisconsinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.