Legal Opinion

Kaneohe Rice Mill Co. v. Holi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Reserved Question from Circuit Judge, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

In a bill in equity for partition the petitioner claims that F. W. Malaihi and Holi -were the sons of Kahalua, the original patentee of the land sought to be partitioned, and that by mesne conveyances the interests of Malaihi and two of the eight children of Holi, an undivided five-eighths in all, passed to and are now in the .petitioner, and also alleges that the respondent Naoiwi is the owner of an undivided three-eighths interest. Respondent Naoiwi answers denying that Malaihi was the son of Kahalua and claiming that Holi was the latter’s only son and that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. ShattuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Wilkin v. WilkinNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Clark v. RollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Deery v. McClintockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Nash v. SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kainea v. KreugerHawaii Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Brown v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Moranho v. De AguiarHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hapai v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API