Legal Opinion

Brown v. Davis

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal erom Circuit Judge, Eikst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

DE BOLT, J.

The complainant, Cecil Brown, trustee, filed his bill in equity seeking to have certain alleged leasehold interests in those lands and premises known as Mokapu, situate in the city and county of Honolulu, partitioned between himself and the respondent, Robert Wyllie Davis. The bill alleges, in substance, that each of the parties (the complainant and the respondent) is the legal owner of an undivided one-half interest in the alleged leasehold thus sought to be partitioned and that they are in possession of the leasehold premises as cotenants.

The answer of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Keil v. WestSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
  2. Clark v. RollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Trapnall v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  4. Criscoe v. HambrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Hoffman v. BeardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kainea v. KreugerHawaii Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Moranho v. De AguiarHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API